Our Human Capital
Development (HCD) initiative is the centerpiece of our Race to the Top plan as
well as integral to the School Improvement Grants at Anson High School and
Morven Elementary. The premise
underpinning the commitment to developing human capital is found in the third requisite essential for connecting the dots in our efforts to
transform our school system - capacity.
The first requisite (dissatisfaction) and the second (vision) without capacity cannot produce the desired or expected results. Underpinning capacity are three critical steps.
The first step is the identification of the necessary skills, knowledge,
and practices to bring about the desired or expected results. The second step is identifying the current
level of skill, knowledge, and application of practices of staff to bring about
the desired or expected results. The
third and final step is a gap analysis to ascertain the distance between the
current and desired skill and knowledge sets.
In our gap analysis we
found that awareness, understanding and application of standards, curriculum,
instruction, and assessment practices varied significantly within grade levels,
content areas, schools and the school system.
Rather than participating in the practice of condemnation, blame, or personal
attacks, we made a very conscious decision to engage in capacity building.
We believed that our
performance results including both student and staff were not a product of
uncaring, unmotivated, or uncommitted individuals. We concluded that until such time that each
staff had access and opportunity to authentic, effective, and evidenced-based
training and learning we could not accept the oft used conclusions, judgments,
or education bashing common to many communities.
For our administration to
support, mentor, model, and authentically assess effective instruction we
needed to focus on their individual and collective skills and knowledge in
instructional leadership. We are now
beginning our third year in working with Atlantic Research Partners in training
not only administration but also now whole schools in Power of Teaching.
To ensure authentic
integration of digital tools we needed to focus primarily on classroom teachers
but have also included building administration for capacity to support
teachers. Our strategic partnership with
Discovery Education, A+ Educators, and Apple to name just three is critical to instructional capacity
building.
Creating coherence as well
as a deep understanding of standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment
integration and alignment has been the work of Total Instructional Alignment.
North Carolina’s own, Lisa Carter has been instrumental in working with
classroom teachers, administration, and teacher leaders to build capacity in
the alignment process.
Capacity building in the
application, utility, and import of summative and formative assessments is created
through the work found in Thinkgate, EVAAS, and soon Milepost by our new partner, Silverback
Learning. There will also be more
work ahead to build staff capacity to use the state’s new Instructional Improvement System.
Specifically to address
student learning achievement deficits capacity building in technology based
supplemental programming was needed – especially in the area of literacy.
The “eradicate illiteracy”
initiative is steeped in building capacity of staff’s awareness, understanding,
and application of programs such as Teachtown,
Headsprout, Reading 3D, Fast ForWord, Reading Assistant, and our newest program
Kurzweil as well as non-technology
based Learning Together. Capacity
building in the area of mathematics required introducing ClassWorks as well as continuing in Math Together – Get Ready for Algebra. Each of these programs is
predicated on knowing how these compliment, augment, and support classroom
based instruction to build, reinforce, or enrich necessary learning skills,
knowledge or experience in our learners.
But when is the best, most
effective means to provide capacity building for our staff? There are generally four formats (1) during
the school day requiring “guest teachers” aka substitutes, (2) afterschool, (3)
mandatory work days, or (4) summer recess.
For our secondary schools we have implemented Late Start Mondays where staff have the first fruits of time on Monday for their learning and growth before
students arrive later in the day. We have created Learning Development Centers (LDC) in four of our schools to
provide a different experience for teachers who participate as cohorts of four
in one, two, three, or four-day seminars.
This past year we implemented a series of one-week institutes for whole faculty learning.
Suffice it to say, capacity building was the
right strategy at the right time. As
part of Human Capital Development, our students are the benefactors of the
learning and growth of our staff now and for years to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.